One step toward that is finally coming up a formal rating system.
My Ratings System:
I rate books on a scale from 0 to 10. I include half of a point when I feel a book deserves somewhat higher than the base rating.
Special note: rating system is modified off one used by Racebannon of The Human Race.
0 : zero is so low I wouldn’t use the pages for toilet paper.
1 : is about as bad as it gets without being zero.
2 : very bad.
3 : is a bad book, but it probably has one or two redeeming qualities or was simply the victim of terrible editing.
4: below average.
5 : an average book. I probably enjoyed parts of it, but it’s probably nothing I'd ever pick up again nor recommend to anyone.
6 : a bit better than average, has several positive qualities.
7 : a good book, one I would recommend to people and that I might re-read in time.
8 : a very good book something that any serious fan of the genre should put on their to-read list. Must be very well written, enjoyable, or be in some way a groundbreaking work.
9 : a great book. One that people should read as soon as possible
10 : as good as it gets. I don't give out 10s too often.
Note that the ratings are entirely subjective, though I do try to be objective and take into account the level of writing or the quality of the ideas. Ultimately, the rating will depend on whether I enjoyed it, on my “gut feeling”.
You may notice that I don’t give out lots of low scores. I am fairly picky about the books I read so I usually only read the books that I think I will like or find interesting. If I don’t like a book I stop reading it. Consequently, I will almost never give out zeroes.
Also note that in putting some actual thought to the reasoning behind the numbers, I realized that I had been blurring some of the levels in the mid-upper range. Ratings will be considered far more carefully and future books may be given a different value than comparable books were given previously.

0 comments:
Post a Comment